HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 2013-02-21login
Stories from February 21, 2013
Go back a day, month, or year. Go forward a day, month, or year.
1.The Chromebook Pixel (chrome.blogspot.com)
475 points by mikeevans on Feb 21, 2013 | 487 comments
2.The Truth about a Failing Startup (pastebin.com)
458 points by throwawayrandom on Feb 21, 2013 | 156 comments
3.Sony Pirates KDE Artwork (kde.org)
434 points by k-i-m on Feb 21, 2013 | 160 comments
4.Petition to make unlocking phones legal again passes 100,000 signatures (thenextweb.com)
332 points by Lightning on Feb 21, 2013 | 165 comments
5.How To Make a Quick Buck (jacquesmattheij.com)
314 points by freshfey on Feb 21, 2013 | 87 comments
6.LivingSocial: Employees' and Founders' Common Stock Now Worthless (privco.com)
314 points by donohoe on Feb 21, 2013 | 224 comments
7.Google has killed Android (the brand) (fabcapo.com)
271 points by muratmutlu on Feb 21, 2013 | 110 comments
8.The Play Framework at LinkedIn (linkedin.com)
219 points by fatiherikli on Feb 21, 2013 | 186 comments

Here are a few tips for others startup employees:

1. Take the least amount of stock possible - your startup is statistically unlikely to succeed. It'd be better to bump your salary up $10-20K than to get the stock.

2. Unless it's liquid - it's worthless.

3. Valuations pre-cashflow - are useless. Anybody can value anything at insane levels using just one dollar. I value HN at $1 billion by offering to buy only 1 share of 1 billion in common stock for $1 right now. See the implicit valuation leverage. I took a dollar, then invented the billion.

4. If you work for a "nasty" startup - one which people can consider to be negative long term to one or more parties - expect eventual collapse or flat line growth (Zynga/Groupon).

5. Companies exist to make management, investors and founders rich - they hold the vast majority of the stock - and benefit greatly from path dependence and network effects. You on the other hand don't. Expect to be screwed at any time.

Think of it like this. Managers/founders of most companies are pretty dipshit - how is it that they can own so much more stock? Simple. Be there earlier! Akin to how old money works. Imagine if you were the first person to squat land near what has now become Manhattan. You'd easily be worth hundreds of millions. There is obviously some skill in researching, predicting, working and acquiring land that will soon appreciate in value. But it's not worth nearly that much. Path dependence, luck and network effects do that. See GFC boom and that dumbass cousin who made and almost certainly lost millions in housing to understand how this works out.

Startups really aren't that different to a speculative investment in a house during boom times. Once you understand this - a lot of things start to make a hell of a lot more sense.

6. PG says be relentlessly resourceful. That's useful. But even better is to be relentlessly cynical.

Free t-shirts? Just an easy way to drop your salary and indoctrinate you - scratch that - it's a god damn uniform - freedom be damned! Free food? You took a $30-$40K pay cut to take the damn job - the food isn't worth a tenth of that + you're now working during lunch hours! Free hardware? That's only $2-$4K.

Hackathons? That's just work during your free time - or if it's during work time, it's a startup product you should own, but don't. More days off? Aren't you already working 60+ hours a week today! Culture shit after work? That's just more indoctrination. Gym membership? Only $200-500 - peanuts! Flexible work hours? That just means work more, but do it at times that aren't 9-5. Parental leave? Big companies and Europe have had that for ages.

Oh, and that culture fit crap? That's just discrimination - rebranded! What? You don't like what other late 20s upper-class educated males like? Be gone heathen!

End advice.

Not saying big companies or government jobs are any better. But at the very least you're already cynical about those things and demand to get paid well enough in risk-adjusted terms.

10.Thrown Off a United Airlines Flight for Taking Pictures (upgrd.com)
203 points by chmars on Feb 21, 2013 | 237 comments
11.Google is working on creating a new protocol named QUIC to replace UDP (plus.google.com)
192 points by patrickaljord on Feb 21, 2013 | 112 comments
12.Panoramic, high resolution picture of London (btlondon2012.co.uk)
162 points by danielhunt on Feb 21, 2013 | 99 comments

There are only three meaningful things you can do with a computer with specs like this: development, design, or gaming. And yet ChromeOS can't do any of these things.

Perhaps this is a vanity product for the wealthy. But wealthy people are going to just surf the web on an iPad.

I really don't get this product.

14.Why Should Taxpayers Give Big Banks $83 Billion a Year? (bloomberg.com)
152 points by lisper on Feb 21, 2013 | 120 comments
15.Why is Spotify chugging upload bandwidth when it is not streaming? (spotify.com)
151 points by whaevr on Feb 21, 2013 | 150 comments
16.Google Announces $1,299 Chromebook Pixel With 2560×1700px Touchscreen (techcrunch.com)
145 points by aaronbrethorst on Feb 21, 2013 | 154 comments
17.Nothing is certain, except death and taxes .. and chargebacks (balancedpayments.com)
141 points by mahmoudimus on Feb 21, 2013 | 68 comments
18.Highcharts 3.0 Beta released (highcharts.com)
133 points by afshinmeh on Feb 21, 2013 | 67 comments
19.When to Sell Your Company (medium.com/on-startups)
131 points by fraqed on Feb 21, 2013 | 16 comments
20.Show HN: Like The Onion, But Real (theon1on.com)
127 points by slifty on Feb 21, 2013 | 90 comments
21.Stack Exchange’s Colocation Move: Lessons Learned (serverfault.com)
126 points by revorad on Feb 21, 2013 | 41 comments
22.I'm Betting on Elon (danielodio.com)
124 points by drodio on Feb 21, 2013 | 123 comments
23.Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us (time.com)
124 points by arbuge on Feb 21, 2013 | 138 comments
24.The Saddest Map In America (andrewsullivan.com)
121 points by dkuebric on Feb 21, 2013 | 98 comments
25.Tell HN: You guys scared edw519 off Hacker News
120 points by Xcelerate on Feb 21, 2013 | 50 comments
26.NBC.com hacked, serving up Citadel malware (hitmanpro.wordpress.com)
108 points by anateus on Feb 21, 2013 | 32 comments
27.What really happened at LivingSocial? (cnn.com)
102 points by speric on Feb 21, 2013 | 131 comments
28.Timelike 2: everything fails all the time (aphyr.com)
99 points by krg on Feb 21, 2013 | 26 comments

Yes - realistic employees are the worst - they are so unexploitable!

What companies really need are wide-eyed, earnest, new college grads who have no idea what goes on in the real world, and how much they are truly being screwed by their current startup.

Those guys rock! They work 100+ hour weeks, they don't have families, or commitments and are willing to do it all for mere peanuts and empty promises of golden rainbows!

Sadly - a few years of this turns them into realistic employees - and you need a whole new batch to replace them.


As an independent restaurant owner, I can't say I didn't expect to see this one day. The model simply doesn't work, at least in our industry. The restaurant loses money on every single "daily deal" that is redeemed. With LivingSocial or (insert any other daily deal site here) taking half of the deal, the restaurant is simply left with 25% of the revenue generated. This does not even cover our food costs, let alone labor.

The rise of daily deal businesses have brought up a couple of fundamental issues for us: 1)Customers are often daily deal hunters - We would be willing to take the one-time loss on a daily deal, if we had a chance of converting the customers into regular diners. However, we have found that most people who purchase these deals, simply move on to the next deal after they are done.

2) Cheapens the product - Once you have lowered the price for a product, in this case food, the guest automatically ties the value of that product back to the price they paid. This is a huge problem for restaurants in particular because the guest is not willing to pay full price for the product even if they liked it. Now your product is valued at half of your current price, and to get that customer back in the door, you have to offer a significant discount again (most likely another daily deal).

3) Cannibalizes our existing customer base - One of the worst unintended consequences of using daily deals is that some of your regular guests start waiting for these deals, and only come in when they are available. This hurts in two ways: 1) regular guests are now spending less than they were the last time they came in, 2) regular guests are now waiting for a LivingSocial/Groupon deal to become available before returning to the restaurant causing them to wait longer before returning to the restaurant.

I believe that a company that provides customer acquisition via deals could be extremely valuable, but they must do it properly, and most importantly it must benefit their customer (in this case the restaurant). Until a company learns how to ensure that a business is obtaining a profit from providing this massive discount, without cheapening the product, and cannibalizing existing sales, the daily deals industry will continue to fall by the wayside.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: