| 1. | | The curious pricing of the 27" iMac (marco.org) |
| 167 points by AndrewWarner on Oct 26, 2009 | 142 comments |
|
| 2. | | XKCD commemerates GeoCities (xkcd.com) |
| 161 points by rglovejoy on Oct 26, 2009 | 31 comments |
|
| 3. | | Ninite: How we got 18,000 beta users in 4 weeks (runitback.tumblr.com) |
| 140 points by swies on Oct 26, 2009 | 23 comments |
|
| 4. | | Ask HN: do you feel Google search result quality has gone down? |
| 112 points by coffeemug on Oct 26, 2009 | 109 comments |
|
| 5. | | Going Back to PHP (pathdependent.com) |
| 83 points by chasingsparks on Oct 26, 2009 | 112 comments |
|
| 6. | | YCRFS 3: Things Built on Twitter (ycombinator.com) |
| 81 points by pg on Oct 26, 2009 | 68 comments |
|
| 7. | | Mac Mini Pays for Itself After 2 Years (cjgill.wordpress.com) |
| 78 points by sahaj on Oct 26, 2009 | 72 comments |
|
| 8. | | Arbitrary code execution via ldd utility (catonmat.net) |
| 83 points by pkrumins on Oct 26, 2009 | 18 comments |
|
| 9. | | New Twitter, JTV RFSes; Winter 2010 deadline pushed back 2 days (ycombinator.com) |
| 65 points by pg on Oct 26, 2009 | 35 comments |
|
| 10. | | After the Deadline now Open Source (afterthedeadline.com) |
| 66 points by raffi on Oct 26, 2009 | 8 comments |
|
| 11. | | Are pointers and arrays equivalent in C? (thegreenplace.net) |
| 65 points by r11t on Oct 26, 2009 | 23 comments |
|
| 12. | | Startup School 2009 Notes & Summary (markbao.com) |
| 63 points by markbao on Oct 26, 2009 | 18 comments |
|
| 13. | | Gemcutter to become default gem host (gemcutter.org) |
| 59 points by rufo on Oct 26, 2009 | 14 comments |
|
| 14. | | Zynga’s Mark Pincus: I got kicked out of some of the best companies in America (venturebeat.com) |
| 58 points by dawie on Oct 26, 2009 | 12 comments |
|
| 15. | | Google Docs Liberated (tekunik.blogspot.com) |
| 56 points by tekunik on Oct 26, 2009 | 11 comments |
|
| 16. | | Ask HN: What have you changed your mind about recently? |
| 54 points by amichail on Oct 26, 2009 | 106 comments |
|
| 17. | | Hasta la Vista, baby: Ars reviews Windows (arstechnica.com) |
| 54 points by soundsop on Oct 26, 2009 | 33 comments |
|
| 18. | | CS researchers find way to derive laws of nature from stacks of data (acm.org) |
| 51 points by jkopelman on Oct 26, 2009 | 12 comments |
|
| |
|
|
| 20. | | The Left Fold, a weekly programming article digest (foldl.org) |
| 48 points by fogus on Oct 26, 2009 | 4 comments |
|
| 21. | | Ask HN: What are your best resume tips? |
| 46 points by tocomment on Oct 26, 2009 | 58 comments |
|
| |
|
|
| 23. | | YCRFS 4: New Ways to Use Live Video (ycombinator.com) |
| 45 points by pg on Oct 26, 2009 | 20 comments |
|
| |
|
|
| 25. | | Xmonad 0.9 released The light, reliable, extensible tiling window manager (xmonad.wordpress.com) |
| 44 points by dons on Oct 26, 2009 | 47 comments |
|
| |
|
|
| 27. | | The SSD Improv (anandtech.com) |
| 40 points by pieter on Oct 26, 2009 | 17 comments |
|
| |
|
|
| 29. | | Microsoft, Google and the Bear (nytimes.com) |
| 36 points by Flemlord on Oct 26, 2009 | 16 comments |
|
| 30. | | What are financial derivatives? (bentilly.blogspot.com) |
| 36 points by btilly on Oct 26, 2009 | 15 comments |
|
|
| More |
SEO: When you cut through all the BS, the entire goal here is to make a less good match come first. And it works (sorta). Just consider crap sites like Experts Exchange that we've only learned about because they pollute many searches.
Feedback effect: Thanks to google, less people do less collecting of good links. Why bother when you can google for it? So there's less good information for google to use in ranking links. Bear in mind that when google started, nearly every home page had a long list of links to all the pages that particular user liked and frequently used. I used to have one; I've long since deleted it; my blog has some outgoing links that I like, but relatively few. If I twittered, I'd probably post a lot of outgoing links, but of dubious value; there's no gardening of just the perfect page of 100 links going on anymore.
(I think this also partially explains why some (generally more specialized, so less effected by other things) results feel dated -- legacy links that are still hanging around from days when links were still used that way.)
Feedback effect: Thanks to google, ten sites tend to be more important than any other sites on any given topic. This results in certain sites becoming increasingly important. Wikipedia is the chief example here. Why is there only one Wikipedia and not a dozen? Chiefly because it's gotten all the google juice. If you want your wiki article on foo to show up in google, you naturally write it on Wikipedia, not Fooipedia. The result here is that all google searches feel increasingly the same -- of course Wikipedia is always in the top ten, or maybe something like Stack Overflow for a technical search.
----
So, these days, if I don't see something interesting in the top ten, I often click on the link to page 10 (or 20, or 100) of the results. Often more interesting. For example, google for "mashed potatos".
Top 10 results: "Perfect mashed potatoes" (SEO), allrecipies.com (always in top 10 for any recipe search), foodnetwork.com, Wikipedia, about.com, nytimes, etc. Pictures of mashed potatos. All generic and useless.
Page ten results: Dairy-free mashed potatoes. _Potato_ free mashed potatos! Caramelized Onion Horseradish Red Mashed Potatoes! A poem about eating them. At least marginally more interesting and quirky. What I would have expected out of google circa 1997.