Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | askl's commentslogin

That sounds even stupider than using it to go to mars. I really hope it stays a fantasy like most musk projects.

Wow, some of these are looking atrocious. (Victor Mono, Syne Mono, Nova Mono)

What I'm missing is DejaVuSansMono which is what I'm using. The result of the test was Ubuntu Mono, which looks okay too.


It is sort of baffling that people make some of these hideous fonts, look at them, and decide to publish them regardless. A font where the lowercase i and l are indistinguishable? Okay...

I was amused that Dank Mono wasn't in the lineup (though there was one that had some of its aesthetics)

https://philpl.gumroad.com/l/dank-mono

The one use case I've seen for Dank Mono was presentations with an overhead projector at conferences. The cursive for italics can make some of the structure of the code more differentiated when viewing it at a distance.


> you can make a router out of basically anything resembling a computer.

So if anything can be turned into a router will importing anything be banned as well?


> an AI image and video generation platform

Shrug. Glad to see stripe is doing something against this.


Google Pixel phones also have this feature since at least 5 years. Spammers usually just hang up instantly.

It's always different this time. It always will only take a couple more months or years. And then people move on to the next hype topic.

> It cites information from the US Government that these IT workers can earn more than $300,000 a year

Doesn't sound that cheap.


Can doesn't mean does


Can happen sometimes. I down voted the comment after reading only the first sentence but then corrected it to an upvote after reading the rest. Not sure if many people have an attention span long enough to do something like this.


Even noticing the sarcasm, it just seems a bit... unnecessary? It interrupts a discussion without adding much, so to me just seems snarky for no good reason.


While I appreciate sarcasm in a time of privacy crisis, I agree. We come to hackernews for discourse and try to follow the rules to have better discourse and comments that only provide sarcasm work against that.


Given his track record, spending should be at four trillion now, right?


Given githubs stance on AI "coding" it would be hypocritical to host the project on github.


So it's a fork based on principle ? I'm a slop hater as much as the next one but that really does seem petty.


Making a decision on principle is the opposite of petty, isn't it?


Yes, the location of the repo really doesn't mean much to me at all, complaining about it being hosted somewhere because of principle is certainly petty.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: