Did you read the link? A NO bet on Joe Dart is a YES bet on Cory Wong + Others.
It is trivial. Saying NO to a candidate means you're saying YES to ALL other candidates with varying probabilities that would sum to the neg risk of that NO bet.
Ah I see, I missed the + Others part in my initial reading, i see it gives the same payout. The shared link just asserts the same thing you’ve asserted with additional technical language that I don’t understand, so reading it didn’t help me much.
Perhaps this is pedantic, but this equivalence is ignoring fees, spread, and slippage, right?
One of the author is from the Ethereum Foundation. Super interesting paper to read. This goes beyond just cryptocurrency. I wrote about it here a while ago: https://kaveh.page/blog/bitcoin-quantum-threat
> I've never gotten a job by applying to it. It's always been referrals or someone reaching out to me. So honestly, my resume is shit compared to my peers.
reply