> The paper lists some of the downsides of machine learning but skips the upsides.
This is entirely correct but I do not think it is a valid criticism of the paper -- the paper does not set out to answer the question of "is machine learning worth using operationally?".
This is entirely correct but I do not think it is a valid criticism of the paper -- the paper does not set out to answer the question of "is machine learning worth using operationally?".