> Religions are irrelevant to the existence of god
As the blog noted, that's certainly not what most religious people believe. You're just not in Dawkins' target audience. So if it's ok with you, i'd rather not continue derailing this thread..
If you dislike derailing threads then when you post something, please ensure it is relevant to the discussion. Your link didn't even make the point you wanted it to, it basically stated "Saying god cannot be proved or disproved is wrong . . . for no reason whatsoever and I provide no justification for my reasoning!"
And no, I'm not in Dawkins' target audience and I'm glad I'm not, because they're anti-religious zealots frothing at the mouth clearly illustrated by your link. There was no evidence and no argument aside from "just 'cause", which IIRC is exactly the reasoning used by the bible.
As the blog noted, that's certainly not what most religious people believe. You're just not in Dawkins' target audience. So if it's ok with you, i'd rather not continue derailing this thread..