Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Perhaps, but taking a famous person's list of books and reposting it with affiliate links and no disclaimer is definitely crossing the line in my book.


Don't think I might have upvoted it, but it does represent a minor convenience.


Why? I'm genuinely interesting in your line of reasoning.


Profiteering in comment sections pollutes the incentives for commenters. Sure the links were useful, but they were much less useful than a person providing a really insightful comment about a typical article that shows up here. I don't want one person making monetary gain over another.


If only there was a system where we could somehow crowdsource deciding which comments are "really insightful" and which are not...


> I don't want one person making monetary gain over another.

Seems like that shipped sailed a long time ago: there are a lot of people who link to their companies, offer jobs, and that kind of thing here. Making money is not a bad thing - spamming is.

If anyone's interested, I hereby offer to spend the entirety of my ill-gotten affiliate gains on beers if anyone ever visits Bend, Oregon.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: