> The law does not need formal definitions like that. Law isn't programming, this is what nerds usually forget.
It is not about laws, but about experts opinions in judgments. Courts routinely hire lawyers and experts to redact very formal, technical, philosophical and nitpicky memos about a topic. The CJEU has a resident pool of such experts and they are all very qualified (and variegate in their political orientation).
Obviously those memos are not turned into law. We are talking about judgments here. But those memos are read and used by judges to inform their decisions. I would just love to get access to the memos that are surely being produced for this case.
It is not about laws, but about experts opinions in judgments. Courts routinely hire lawyers and experts to redact very formal, technical, philosophical and nitpicky memos about a topic. The CJEU has a resident pool of such experts and they are all very qualified (and variegate in their political orientation).
Obviously those memos are not turned into law. We are talking about judgments here. But those memos are read and used by judges to inform their decisions. I would just love to get access to the memos that are surely being produced for this case.