HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your compiler, or rather your architecture definition supplied to the compiler, is broken. NULL should be an invalid pointer value — it need not actually be memory address 0. (The explicit constant 0 in a pointer context should be automatically translated by the compiler into this special invalid pointer value.) There have been several such architectures already, so this should not present an insurmountable problem.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: