Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Those read like classes generated by tools. Or maybe I really don't want to think humans are capable of such names.


These are completely credible class names, just ask any Enterprise Java developer. I particularly enjoy FactoryProtocol-Protocol. Who would be satisfied with just a FactoryProtocol?


Yea, I was going to say, Java's almost got them beat with SimpleBeanFactoryAwareAspectInstanceFactory[1]

1: http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/2.5.x/javadoc-api/org/spri...


Invoking the Spring framework here is just cheating -- they have dozens of classes like that! :-)

Just the other day I was dealing with Spring's declarative transactional support. Here's a fun read: http://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/4.2.x/spring-fra...


Well, the humans could be tools...


They could be. The effective coding standards for iOS are to make class names stupidly long.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: