Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Your information is out of date.

I am shopping for cars right now, I'm talking about my current experience with the cost of recently used vehicles (specifically Toyota, Honda, and other reliable brands).

> I work in the used car industry and across the board (on average) used cars depreciate at about 1.5% to 2% per month!

Where can I buy these two year old vehicles that are 48% off? Or a three year old vehicle for 72% off? I'm seriously asking, link me to a 2017 Toyota Highlander Limited for $22K or a 2016 Limited for only $11K...

Locally a 2017 Toyota Highlander Limited is $32K with 65K miles on it. Or $36K with under 20K miles, that's a two year old likely ex-lease vehicle that has a 15% discount, but a higher APR, worse features, higher maintenance costs, diminished warranty, and a lower resale value.

The current used market is highly irrational right now. Your imagined used market where cars are 48% off after only two years sounds fantastic, but that isn't the reality on the ground.



> Where can I buy these two year old vehicles that are 48% off? Or a three year old vehicle for 72% off? I'm seriously asking, link me to a 2017 Toyota Highlander Limited for $22K or a 2016 Limited for only $11K...

You misunderstand what 2% depreciation means per month.

2 years at 2% would be: 1 - (0.98^24) ends up at 38.4% off, not your 48%.

3 years at 2% would be: 1 - (0.98^36) == 51.6%, not your 72%.

The reason obviously being that 2% off monthly means that the 12th month's 2% is a lower dollar amount that the first month's 2%. This is also intuitively true since a vehicle depreciates more steeply at the beginning and less over time in total dollar terms.

Also I said 1.5 to 2%. At the 1.5% end of the range, a vehicle at 3 years is: 1 - (0.985^36) == 41.9%.


> 2 years at 2% would be: 1 - (0.98^24) ends up at 38.4% off, not your 48%.

> 3 years at 2% would be: 1 - (0.98^36) == 51.6%, not your 72%.

Can you link me to a 2017 Toyota Highlander Limited for $26K or a 2016 Limited for $21K? Because I cannot find either one.

New figures, old figures, it still doesn't remotely match reality. Used vehicles don't exist at the price points you claim they exist at.

Even at 65K miles, we're talking over $31K. You're off by a huge margin.

You said:

> Your information is out of date.

Pretty sure you have that backwards. If you look at the used market it isn't remotely like what you've claimed twice now.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: