Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I have read so many times where car enthusiasts complain that they can't get the options they want with a manual transmission. Well, it's perfectly logical - when one aspect of a product is the deciding factor for a subgroup of customers, and the seller knows it, it's more profitable to give them the worst of everything else. It's nothing personal, just optimization of the business.

I do actually think this is a special case. most people in america can't drive stick and don't want to learn either. for most cars that still have manual as an option, it saves you $800-1200 on the base trim of the car. so I imagine there's a weird bimodal distribution where one group of people wants manual just because it's the cheapest version of the car, while you also have enthusiasts who are willing to purchase a lot of the options (at least the performance related ones). either way, cars with manual transmissions are a fairly low volume market in the US. they can be pretty hard to move.



Oddly, I hear more groaning about not being able to buy manuals every day here. It sees more of a metro vs rural thing. Metro folk only want autos because traffic, and rural folk like the control, and feel of manuals more on smaller roads. Living near mountains manuals are hugely popular as they allow much safer driving by engine braking, while many will overheat their brakes.

Other than a few fleet style trucks, most manual options in the usa are performance models.


> Oddly, I hear more groaning about not being able to buy manuals every day here. It sees more of a metro vs rural thing.

Maybe, but in the city I live in, I hear more and more grumbling about the lack of manual transmissions over time as well.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: