Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As I'm posting this, the top submission on the /news page is "Why Microsoft Sucks: Hotmail dev team questions need for open standards".

I am guilty of upvoting it. Five seconds of thinking before upvoting would have prevented me from doing so - the linked comment just doesn't support the headline and Microsoft being hostile/oblivious to open standards isn't such big news anyway.

My point is that maybe we should be able to cancel upvotes. This would give upvoters the chance to read the comments (shallow stories usually have some comments pointing out that they are not that interesting) get convinced that they made a mistake and fix it.

Well, I understand that this might not be as simple as decreasing the counter. I suspect that there might be some impact on the ranking algorithm and probably a dozen things I haven't thought about. Still it might be worth it.



In the last six months, I've seen a lot of linkbait on the edge of webspam get voted highly on HN.

Although HN's quality is better than it's competition, HN subscribers still have the psychology that makes Reddit what it is. (Now, you need a ~lack~ of psychology to explain Digg, but that's another story)


Reddit is actually pretty good for 'hacker news' if you unsubscribe from the front page and everything not related to hacking, then add all the programming-related subreddits you're interested in.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: