Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> but this is possibly the most important patent of the last 30 years

It is an interesting struggle to figure out what my objection to that point is. I think it is that we know exactly how hard it is to apply linear algebra to a problem - not everyone's cup of tea, but easily 10% of software engineers would be able to do it.

The truly groundbreaking part of Google was never the indexing - that was a problem that was going to get solved one way or another. The groundbreaking part is figuring out that search + low latency + advertising is a money printing machine and that tech favours the winner.

The mechanism to achieve search + low latency + advertising is important but to some degree unimpressive. If the other search engines at the time had realised the payoffs and how important latency was they'd have gone short text-only ads too and put more engineering time into the problem - maybe someone other than Google would be the search engine of the day.

And even if PageRank was the difference between Google and a hypothetical runner up, the difference of a better algorithm would be marginal. Decisive, but ultimately marginal.



Back then google loaded in a few seconds whilst the competition could take over a minute for the 99% of users who were on a 28.8k dial-up.

It's almost as if the people behind Lycos/Excite/Altavista were all using the internet via a T1 connection from their unis..


I think a big factor is that Google didn’t have to make any money and could keep their homepage as simple as possible.


Altavista was actually just a tech demo of their servers :)


And Google had connections to which large organizations from their start that gave them competitive advantage in multiple areas?




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: