This breaks the site guidelines, which ask you to assume good faith. That's not because everyone is necessarily in good faith—though close observation shows that it is more likely to be true here than many users think. Rather, it's because not making that assumption leads to community-eroding behavior. Please don't post like this.
Do you believe that Reuters engages or would engage in a disinformation campaign at the behest of a western government? If so, do you have evidence to share with us that supports this belief?
Similarly, Reuters points to three anonymous sources in the article. Do you believe that Reuters fabricated these sources? If so, do you have evidence to share with us that supports this belief?
