Consider that JABS directed people to a medical professional researching a link between vaccinations and behavioural changes and that this is what the parents were seeking. More over that had the case studies been properly examined that a causal link would have been demonstrated to be unlikely. How then is JABS culpable?
Or did I miss something?
Even if JABS commissioned the research unless they instructed that fraud should be carried out I don't see the harm they did?
Could someone respond with why JABS are culpable, just one sentence would do. That info doesn't appear to have been presented here. What did they do? Thanks.
Or did I miss something?
Even if JABS commissioned the research unless they instructed that fraud should be carried out I don't see the harm they did?