Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Let me quote Torkel Franzen in this issue:

> True in the Standard Model

> The idea is sometimes expressed that instead of speaking of arithmetical statements as true or false, we should say that they are "true in the standard model" or "false in the standard model". The following comment illustrates:

>> This is the source of popular observations of the sort: if Goldbach's conjecture is undecidable in PA, then it is true. This is actually accurate, if we are careful to add "in the standard model" at the end of the sentence.

> The idea in such comments seems to be that if we say that an arithmetical statement A is "true" instead of carefully saying "true in the standard model", we are saying that A is true in every model of PA. This idea can only arise as a result of an over-exposure to logic. In any ordinary mathematical context, to say that Goldbach's conjecture is true is the same as saying that every even number greater than 2 is the sum of two primes. PA and models of PA are of concern only in very special contexts, and most mathematicians have no need to know anything at all about these things. It may of course have a point to say "true in the standard model" for emphasis in contexts where one is in fact talking about different models of PA.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: