Your posts don't make any sense. Rust compiles down to assembly too, but it's a safe language, so what? The compilation target has nothing to do with the relative safety of the language.
> The compilation target has nothing to do with the relative safety of the language
Yes, obviously. Almost as though the fact that all languages end up as x86 or ARM opcodes at the end of the day has literally nothing to do with the merits and demerits of their respective type systems, but people keep bringing it up like some kind of gotcha when type systems get criticized.
