Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

ChuckMcM had an interesting observation elsewhere that times of such crisis are perfect for companies to deliver bad news, as the blame (and perhaps opposition) gets lost in the noise. I'm wondering if something similar will happen in politics - a lot of things that were not possible to push through in calmer times will now get implemented, with all the energy pandemic mitigation adds to them, and they'll stick after all it's done. Government has a lot of inertia after all.

https://hackertimes.com/item?id=22571121



It’s happened in politics for a long time. Two decades ago, a political advisor in the British government sent an email on 11th Sept 2001 saying the day was “a very good day to get out anything we want to bury”. It didn’t go down well, but others have been much more subtle.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/1588323.stm


Naomi Klein wrote a major book about this years ago called The Shock Doctrine.


I now think of these economic shocks as opportunities for profit taking, like a game of musical chairs. Sell off before the rubes notice, then buy it all back up at bargain prices.

Previously, Kevin Phillips' book Wealth & Democracy in America is a more academic, pedantic telling of the same story.

https://www.amazon.com/Wealth-Democracy-Fortunes-Government-...


Well, not only ChuckMcM:

https://hackertimes.com/item?id=22566970

He however was not downvoted for the observation.


The difference seems that ChuckMcM observed a pattern of reactions, whereas cryptica postulated an active conspiracy to create a disaster.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: