> Is it wise to have children in the same building from which you intend to shoot at the police?
Just so you can't accuse me of sidestepping the question, my answer to this is obviously "no".
Feel free to answer whether you think that killing 5 children and burning 61 homes was necessary to subdue the attacker at any time.
The fact is, if you literally can't even say that burning children to death was wrong, you don't get to go around pretend you have an ethical stance on arson.
5 children were killed by police.
61 homes were burned--the vast majority of these homes were neighbors who had nothing to do with MOVE.
Were either of these things "necessary to subdue the attacker"?