HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think anyone ever suggested it was a choice... PG just said he'd be reluctant to start a startup with a woman who had an infant or was planning to have a baby soon. That doesn't mean he NEVER would.

But if a potential co-founder said, "I have a hobby I can't give up. It can cause me to lose sleep for days or weeks on end (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/magazine/mag-17Sleep-t.htm...), cause marital stress, costs a ton of money (about a million bucks over 21 years), is intermittently really loud, and will likely require frequent trips to the doctor", would you be at all reluctant to team up with that person? I would. There are all sorts of things that could cause me to want to pair up with them anyways (lots of money, stay-at-home spouse or in-law, etc), but the bar would be higher.

A baby isn't startup insta-death-- there are plenty of examples of where it has worked out just fine. But it's heaping difficulty, stress, and expense on an already difficult, stressful and expensive exercise.



People having babies is kinda important. Strange how difficult modern life is with children.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: