Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That is very positive and reassuring to hear. When my then-wife and I had our son, it was still very strong "breast is best" messaging. It really has made a lot of parents feel awful amounts of guilt and shame.

Personally, until we have very strong evidence that breast milk is significantly better for the baby, I think the messaging shouldn't even be "breast feed if you can"- it should be "breast feed if you want". Some women have a terrible experience breast feeding even though the technically "can" produce the milk. It can be physically quite uncomfortable, it keeps dad from being able to bond as well, the baby might not be good at "latching", etc.



> If you are not a scientist who has actually conducted one of these studies; if you are not intimately familiar with the methodologies and the math techniques used in the analysis; if you've only ever read the headline and maybe an abstract of a study- then please don't give advice to anyone on the topic. Please don't spread "information" that X is better than Y.

Do you have a good article backing this -

> I think the messaging shouldn't even be "breast feed if you can"- it should be "breast feed if you want".

Preferably a solid journal article, or an analytical news article. The top ones on Google are just emotive.

Nutrition from womb to 2 years is vital, it's probably the most important deal-able issue in the world today. I'll assume that advice is only for HN users who have clean water and access to good baby formula and the IQ's and education to do it properly.

I don't see why formula is not as good as, if not better than breast. But evidence is breast is best as far as I can see.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: