Thank you so much for the feedback, I'm really happy I was able to create something that people need.
I'm sorry but I'm a little confused as to what the second part of your comment is suggesting. Are you saying that the name should be changed to something like git-task, or that the commands for the utility should follow git's command conventions?
Oh awesome I didn't know about that I'll definitely look into it. Do you think people would be more likely to use it because they can type 'git' instead of 'tigger' (or whatever name it ends up being)?
It would definitely fit into git's naming convention for commands better. Whether or not that makes it stickier with users is probably an question only focus testing can answer :)
I'm sorry but I'm a little confused as to what the second part of your comment is suggesting. Are you saying that the name should be changed to something like git-task, or that the commands for the utility should follow git's command conventions?