I'm very confused how you are coming to this conclusion. You haven't stated how rich the owners are. All I'm getting is you're saying that since the company still exists that the owners didn't retire. But what does "optionality to retire" mean? (Not even a real word) And what lifestyle? You can always up your lifestyle (maybe once you're worth 100bn it's all the same, but that's a dumb bar). The metric (I think) you are using is unobtainable. But a more clear metric of "could the owners retire and still live in luxury?" is a definitive yes.