> Load it with a script nomodule tag and you always have a JS fallback that covers weird edge cases like the one described in the article.
I'm confused.
How would this have helped the author's mom who is stuck on Chrome 76? Chrome 76 is modern enough to have ignored the script nomodule, but too old to understand the optional chaining operator.
You're right, my bad. I was getting ahead of my self. The JS fallback covers older, non-evergreen browsers and the HTML fallback covers everything (including the described issue)
I'm confused.
How would this have helped the author's mom who is stuck on Chrome 76? Chrome 76 is modern enough to have ignored the script nomodule, but too old to understand the optional chaining operator.