This claims too much. Differentials in power may always exist, but that doesn't mean power has the same distribution in all systems.
Social democratic systems coupled with vibrant civil societies lead to societies where power, though still distributed unevenly, forms a more interconnected and open network, instead of one centralized institution or small set of institutions that dominates society.
It's a bit unclear, though, which one leads to the other. Or if they're simply the same.
Social democratic systems coupled with vibrant civil societies lead to societies where power, though still distributed unevenly, forms a more interconnected and open network, instead of one centralized institution or small set of institutions that dominates society.
It's a bit unclear, though, which one leads to the other. Or if they're simply the same.