> This kind of impulsivity is exactly what I don't want from people dealing with money.
You're going to be really disappointed to hear how most fintech startups, and non-startups, and non-fintech software companies, and non-startup companies, operate then.
Yeah its bad, but lets not act like the bar was ever high to begin with.
I'm not saying that's the bar across all companies, that's ridiculous. I'm saying my bar is someone has to prove they are competent for me to trust them with my money.
And given how many crypto scams there have been, one's bar should be higher than your normal startup, unless you don't care about losing money put into it.
It's the same way I don't let a friend borrow money if he's generally irresponsible or burned me in the past just because he guarantees he can double it by the end of the month.
I don't know if you're implying this, but it seems like you think because every company has to start somewhere it means they inherently deserve trust and little criticism to help them along?
They are trying to build a physical/digital bearer instrument. Not a company, pure cash in your pocket. Of course the standards for security are higher.
Would the security details have ever been worked on if people weren't commenting here?
Are they going to take orders before putting it up?
Are they aware of how prevalent crypto scams are and how vitally important it is to distance yourself if you want to be taken seriously?
This kind of impulsivity is exactly what I don't want from people dealing with money.