HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thick? Sturdy? They're 15mm/0.61 inches thick. Most of that is used up by the base, the screen is a terrifyingly flimsy 3.6mm thin.

Comfortable? The key travel is 1mm. I'd hardly call that comfortable, that's a concession to thin-ness.

And they're not that fast just looking at power specs - the new processors are impressively efficient, but if they prioritized professional performance and effective heat dissipation over being skinny, just imagine what that efficient processor could do with 70% more power dissipation/heat removal.

Also, "fast" and "beast of a battery" may be true for now, but in a few years, when memory and storage are cheaper and faster, you won't be able to update, and when your battery starts to degrade you won't be able to click in a new one. Again, because long-term performance, upgradeability, and repairability have been sacrificed for the sake of thin.



I can see the merit in offering a “workstation” model that throws noise and heat out the window in favor of power, but as a native mobile dev who’s compiling all day I think the 14”/16” models make the right tradeoffs for the overwhelming majority.

No, my company provided work M1 Pro 16” isn’t going to beat my 5950X custom built tower or some of the high end Ryzen 6000 series laptops, but that’s fine. It’s still very fast and responsive while being inaudible 99% of the time, never hitting lap scorching temperatures, and having battery life measured in double digits.

I suspect that an unwieldy, hot, loud desktop replacement M-series machine would be very niche.


You don't have to imagine, the same processors are available in the Mini line and direct comparisons have been made in detail.

tl;dr if you have a use case where it's a significant difference you already know that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: