HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure that it was PR. It is quite popular to be consistent and defend anybody who isn't convicted of a crime. If you are choosing to get CDN / DDOS protection and are running any site that may not be the most popular do you want to go with the company that bends their knee when the internet comes calling?


> It is quite popular to be consistent and defend anybody who isn't convicted of a crime.

I don’t know how popular this is, or at least how popular it should be.

Conviction is based on the extremely high bar of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the standard for depriving a person of their liberty.

Society rightly does not operate at that standard. Conviction was never meant to be a proxy for whether you ought to do business with somebody.

Think about killers who “got off on a technicality,” where everyone knew they were guilty. Or open criminals who for whatever reason were unable to face a jury, like many mass shooters. It just doesn’t make sense to say “well the courts never formally convicted them so we have a duty to defend them.”

Sorry if this is long-winded. I am just alarmed by this trend of equating legal standards with social standards.


It's not popular if you're complicit in spreading hate for trans people.


Can you name a website that allows user content that is not "complicit in spreading hate for trans people"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: