> That seems if anything to reinforce the idea that this is unrelated to welfare?
I don't recall claiming that it was because of welfare. I'm merely providing context to one of the earlier posts — a number of people on government assistance are constantly trying to take the site down, the admin notices a pattern with the DDoS attacks, and speculates it's because that aligns with when government assistance is paid out.
I am not saying that his speculation was true, but it makes significantly more sense if you understand why he may have come to the conclusion.
Are people on assistance not allowed to sue people?
The narrative is obviously "those idiot leftists on the dole don't have jobs and waste their time and money on this." The causal relationship is critical to the narrative.
> Are people on assistance not allowed to sue people?
Of course they are, which is why I never said or implied this.
I am referring to people who spend years filing frivolous lawsuits that are continuously dismissed for things like improper jurisdiction, failing to state a claim, or suing the wrong people, and ignore any judgement or advice provided by the judge. Hence why I referred to them as vexatious.
> The narrative is obviously "those idiot leftists on the dole don't have jobs and waste their time and money on this." The causal relationship is critical to the narrative.
I am fairly left-leaning and grew up on government assistance. There is no narrative beyond describing factual events.
I will try to link some relevant court cases when I get home.
That seems if anything to reinforce the idea that this is unrelated to welfare?
- KF finds some vexatious litigants and starts targeting them
- The vexatious litigants sue KF
- ???
The pattern that's jumping out to me here isn't that people are on government assistance.