Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> they're not spending money, it's not a cost

I'm not sure I follow that. If you're getting those shares instead of a higher salary, there's no effective difference between that and a cost you paid out of pocket (except for certain tax implications).



Shopify's plan is an oddity in the industry, normally one doesn't directly trade RSUs and base comp. Netflix has allowed for this (probably still does, but I haven't negotiated against a Netflix offer recently), but I don't know of any other significant examples.

That said, legally, even in the specific case of the Shopify plan, you aren't taking cash and spending it on Shopify stock. If you were, your tax situation would be more complicated.


> normally one doesn't directly trade RSUs and base comp

You do, it just isn't spelled out. If you're getting comp in one way (RSUs), then you're not getting it in other ways (salary). The same is true of other benefits, like free food, 401k contributions, etc. It generally isn't a 1-to-1 thing, but it _is_ a tradeoff.


I look forward to your perspective when the IRS starts arguing your free food and other benefits should be taxed like regular income.


Netflix lets you take a fraction of your pay in long term options, not RSUs


You get 4 years of exposure. You can’t pre-allocate 4 years of salary. That is the difference.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: