How is it useless bias? Go has not proven itself that it has what it takes to be a language that a developer would want to use. What problems has it solved that no other language has solved? What problems has it solved better than other languages that also solved them?
The answers to those two questions have not impressed me. So, if my bias is simply using basic logic to evaluate a language, then I think I'm going to keep using my "useless bias".
All of the Go projects I've used have been well-constructed and efficient. It's the language the devs chose, and it lends well to the things it's been used for. Personally, I really like the syntax. Those reasons are good enough for me.
The answers to those two questions have not impressed me. So, if my bias is simply using basic logic to evaluate a language, then I think I'm going to keep using my "useless bias".