HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This view seems inconsistent. Artificial manipulation is not sustainable in the long term. The ability to continually create conditions that lead to cheap labor is limited and will eventually fail.


On the contrary, it seems that increase of income inequality is a natural trend.


Since when? 40 years ago? Yes.

400 years ago? Hardly.


With AI+capital on the manipulating side I am not sure there are any limits.


AI is not magic, neither is capital for that matter. To perform any function in the world, it needs some type of physical form or device to do so. These devices take capital to manufacture and maintain. They're also vulnerable to intentional damage. There are obvious limits.


Capital = physical

AI = control of how to wield the Capital and defend against intentional damage

What are the obvious limits?


What artificial manipulation?


Are you saying that you presume the inequality is the natural state of things? What are you basing that on? A world with governments and corporations that are capable of squashing the populace? Do you ever wonder what influence this has?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: