That makes about no sense (except as really deadpan satire), the strength of the human visual system is in "chunking" shapes, and making letters into clouds of disconnected dots is about the last thing you want to do to it, if you don't have to. If you do have to, there are already well-established systems that do this (Morse code and Braille).
Teletypes switched to printing actual letters as soon as they could, even though there were people very highly trained in reading the dots and dashes.
They sure are disconnected; you've made clouds of dots instead of continuous shapes. Ponder the fact that a dumbbell shape is easier for a human to process and recognize than two disconnected dots.
On the other hand, if you're on some kind of a business-school inhibition-reduction assignment (you know, like "get up in public and say the stupidest thing you can think of"), then you're doing well.
> They sure are disconnected; you've made clouds of dots instead of continuous shapes.
You may be looking at the table of letters, which is just for illustration, where the letters aren't connected. But if you look at the examples you'll see they are very much connected, and appear to form shapes.
I won't dismiss this outright. I do find it to be fairly interesting. If a system like this were to gain wide spread usage, I think many invaluable insights on reading ( and all those behaviors associated with it ) would be realized regardless of how effective a system this proves to be.
Teletypes switched to printing actual letters as soon as they could, even though there were people very highly trained in reading the dots and dashes.