But my point is this linked-to essay appears not only to exclude some areas of good science, but to suggest that any topics which cannot be replicated before publication is only worthy of publication in the Journal of Irreproducible Results.
I gave examples to highlight why I disagree with author's opinion.
Please do not interpret this to mean I do not think improvement is possible.
But my point is this linked-to essay appears not only to exclude some areas of good science, but to suggest that any topics which cannot be replicated before publication is only worthy of publication in the Journal of Irreproducible Results.
I gave examples to highlight why I disagree with author's opinion.
Please do not interpret this to mean I do not think improvement is possible.