Well one interesting complication detailed in the thread was:
> due to convoluted copyright reasons that I don't understand (i'm a gimmick account not a lawyer sorry), a low resolution version of the pic eventually was uploaded to Wikipedia as "a faithful digitisation of a unique historic image" that "may qualify as non-free use"
> due to convoluted copyright reasons that I don't understand (i'm a gimmick account not a lawyer sorry), a low resolution version of the pic eventually was uploaded to Wikipedia as "a faithful digitisation of a unique historic image" that "may qualify as non-free use"