That *should* read: InfluxDB said in March this year it had solved the cardinali... | Hacker News

HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		ericb on Sept 22, 2023 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: CERN swaps out databases to feed its petabyte-a-da... That should read: InfluxDB said in March this year it had solved the cardinality issue with a new IOx storage engine for it's hosting customers only There isn't an influxdb that you can download with cardinality solved.

coder543 on Sept 22, 2023 [–]

As of today, they announced a plan for open sourcing a version of v3, but they make it clear in the article that it won't be a great fit for every existing use case.

https://www.influxdata.com/blog/the-plan-for-influxdb-3-0-op...

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact