I think this solution is about the perfect thing I can come up with, conceptually. Nocode is easy but rigid. Coding is flexible but tedious and error prone.
Being able to talk out what you want to quickly get the code, as long as it's clean, gives you the flexibility to then tune as needed. And in some cases, like apparently this one, that wasn't even necessary. Exciting times ahead...
I guess the thing that's still lacking from an AI code solution is security guard rails. My demo below for example is open to injection attacks but I think that could be solved with fine tuning or custom instructions.
You can't just have amateurs copying and pasting stuff into production environments, but even the task of writing tests can be given to an AI. Like you get one AI to write some code, then you get another AI to write code to test it. The chances of perfectl complementary errors are pretty low, but even if that happens you then get an AI to write a frontend script to run automated integration tests, and then have some human quality control at the end.
Really, I think a code-based AI pipeline has much more long term potential than no code does. The interfaces are just so laborious.
Being able to talk out what you want to quickly get the code, as long as it's clean, gives you the flexibility to then tune as needed. And in some cases, like apparently this one, that wasn't even necessary. Exciting times ahead...