Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's a much better introduction to write here, so I'll jump right into avoiding one.

I realize this isn't an expected possibility, but I've reached a point where I am not able to uncover where it might have gone wrong.

I've tried to keep things direct and in point form, to (attempt to) make it easier to spot any assumptions made.

This might not make it as readable as it could be, and specifically avoids the formalization required for a proof, but I have more to add if it holds up.

Thank you in advance for any feedback provided or questions to clarify on.



are you sure you're counting reals? not rationals?


The construction counts an arbitrary length list of numbers, each which can count an integer > 0. The case between a number < 1 and a number >=1 is also addressed.

If that holds true without missing any possibilities, then this maps to the continued fractions. I've gone through several such mappings that missed at least one before, so looking to see if this one has any such as well.

https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Di... A bit before and after section (6.1.13) covers how the continued fractions then provide a counting of the reals, provided any finite representations are > 2 for the last number.

So well I'm not sure it all holds up, it does appear that way.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: