Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It doesn't need to be twice as good, it needs to generate more net income.


"net income" may be a bit simplistic for the moment, but agreed that it doesn't need to be twice as good. it simply needs to be the best. just because the marginal value of adding people goes down, doesn't mean you shouldn't keep adding them.


has anyone cared about net income in decades? maybe it's about signaling to investors, "we have 100s of people working on [emergent technology]"


> has anyone cared about net income in decades?

Uh, you mean net income also known as "net profit"? So your question is effectively "has anyone cared about profit in decades?"

Well... yes


i was being sarcastic. my fault. the joke is wework, theranos, snapchat, lyft...


Oh, sorry I missed it.


Just during every quarterly earning report


just tell investors to look at adjusted net ebitda. you'll be fine, they won't even notice (sarcasm because you need this stuff spelled out for you)

It called the fully adjusted number “community adjusted Ebitda,” by which it subtracted not only interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, but also basic expenses like marketing, general and administrative, and development and design costs. Those earnings were $233 million, WeWork said.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: