> Spoiler alert: this labor theory of value is disproven. A great answer to this question would have started with The labor theory of value is a now disproven theory that was instrumental to the progress of economics … or something along those lines. However, as the LLM never had the opportunity to actively digest the information it received, this understanding never crystallized.

How sure are we that this is not due to some politically correct filter forced upon a raw inference? Perhaps the machine tries to correlate dismissing labor theory as closer to dissing its left leaning overlords.

Gemini, a week before, might have said labour theory is correct.

While there is some obvious US-centric left wing bias in most major LLMs, I am not sure this is what is at play here. I routinely end-up with similar behaviors on all sort of subjects.