The quality of the article is what should drive voting and flagging.
Your personal opinion as to what level of AI tooling was used in crafting the content is a low value signal and posting that speculation without meaningfully engaging in the content is as low value as commenting to say "this article sucks".
Personally, I think this would be a very strange place to find pute AI genetated content. This is a personal statement that was submitted to the state, and posted under a real name under a site the poster has a professional association with. I think that any "strangeness" in formating a wording comes from the role this text serves, as a public comment intended to affect policy.
Why would I want to read some AI-generated slop? It's no different to spam, other than techbros being okay shoving it everywhere and anywhere it doesn't belong.
