Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Intel are probably using a TAGE style predator along the lines of ITTAGE or COTTAGE from http://www.irisa.fr/caps/people/seznec/JILP-COTTAGE.pdf

These predictors change their prediction (both direction and destination) based on the history of the last few hundred branches and if they were taken or not-taken. So the predictor needs to know where those branches were, even if they aren't taken.

Indirect TAGE predictors are very powerful. They can correctly predict jump tables and virtual function calls.

In general, branch predictors don't utilise their tables very efficiently. Cheap and fast lookups are way more important than minimising size.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: