Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Local councillors being against development is nothing to do with bank bailouts, which have (mostly) been repaid by selling off the banks again.


That isn't what I mean. The moral hazard is caused by the bailouts. It isn't about the sum itself. Merely the guarantee that the tab for large gambling losses will be taken by the taxpayers.


- not gambling, mortgages

- not in the end a loss (banks taken into government ownership eventually sold for about the acquisition price

- bank shareholders lost their money

- you don't want to see everything turned into Northern Rock bank runs


The banks should have been nationalised.Iceland was able to solve they Monte Carlo GFC event without creating a moral hazard.


They DID nationalise the banks! https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN05...

They ended up with 100% of Northern Rock and Bradford and Bingley; 84% of RBS, and 43% of Lloyds.


Thanks for that info. Live and learn.


Thankyou for this comment. The GFC is a complicated subject; there WAS a lot of reprehensible behavior, but it's often not correctly identified because people like simple problems with clear villains.

The history of Anglo-Irish Bank is an even more interesting story; Sean Quinn is one of the few bankers who was actually jailed, even if only for a short time.


We should have shot a few bankers in 2008 to encourage the others.


Quite a broad term "bankers". Who does that include?


How about one in 2024?


It’s 2025.


But the CEO was killed in 2024.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: