You’re defending these scientists’ choice to cloak radical ideological stances in their scientific authority, and Science’s decision to broadcast those stances, lending them unearned legitimacy. You’re excusing the letter authors by insisting they don’t equate anti-DEI directives with white supremacy. But instead of calling them out for viciously and dishonestly branding those directives as a 'recodification of white supremacist philosophies', you’re criticizing me for objecting to this sham being paraded as science