Proving policy controls are in place and that actions were taken is a fairly universal problem.
Cryptography doesn't really do as much to improve it as one would think. Yes, providing evidence of sequence or that stuff happened before a certain time is a helpful tool to have in the toolbox.
The earliest human writings date to about 3000-3500 BCE, and are almost entirely ledgers on clay tablets.
I want to point out a little asymmetry. It's a little rude to generate a bunch of stuff, including writing, using LLMs, and then expect actual humans to interact with it. If it wasn't your time to do and understand and say, why should it be worth others' time to read and respond to it?
Cryptography doesn't really do as much to improve it as one would think. Yes, providing evidence of sequence or that stuff happened before a certain time is a helpful tool to have in the toolbox.
The earliest human writings date to about 3000-3500 BCE, and are almost entirely ledgers on clay tablets.
I want to point out a little asymmetry. It's a little rude to generate a bunch of stuff, including writing, using LLMs, and then expect actual humans to interact with it. If it wasn't your time to do and understand and say, why should it be worth others' time to read and respond to it?