Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

OK, but to qualify it also needs glowing comments about the writing, not just interaction with the concept (or title) of the article. Only one person did that ...

https://hackertimes.com/item?id=47973724

... then got contradicted and downvoted.



Gotta go back two weeks, but this is the kind of comment I had in mind:

https://hackertimes.com/item?id=47808139


Fair, lol. I will admit I didn't read the comments :P




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: