Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

4.5/4.6 were roughly the same in our testing. Opus 4.7 is smarter, but it's difficult to use as a product for various personality issues. So far, Opus 4.8 seems to be going down that path (unusably slow, but this could be a launch day rollout problem). Full Opus 4.8 tests are in progress now.

Data at https://gertlabs.com/rankings

 help



"personality issues" I was able to tell that Opus 4.7 would take instructions more literally, which I appreciated once I calibrated my phrasing to be more precise (often asking to investigate issues, pre-4.7 it'd start making code changes instead of just giving write up). But I can see contexts where handling vague prompts would've just been worse

Looking forward to the results. Thanks for your work.

Appreciate that! Results are live: https://gertlabs.com/rankings

Opus 4.8 is the first tangible improvement since Opus 4.5. And it doesn't seem to have the personality problems of the last release -- I've been enjoying using it.


Nice! Looks like it’s topping the two coding ones. I noticed it is absent from the Social Intelligence board though?

That'll populate over the next couple weeks -- those are the live games on the spectate tab which take a while to generate statistically worthwhile data. I'm curious how it does. From using it all day, I can say Opus 4.8 is my new favorite model, hands down.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: