Hacker Times
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
GiorgioG
50 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
PgDog is funded and coming to a database near you
For a vast majority of use cases 20TB is positively enormous.
mplanchard
50 days ago
|
next
[–]
RDS caps out at 64 TB unless you use Aurora, so 20 TB is totally manageable without sharding.
returningfory2
50 days ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
This product is for Postgres deployments that are so large they need to be sharded. For these use cases, I think 20TB is about normal.
jeltz
50 days ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
Yes. But for most workloads it is not much for PostgreSQL. You often will not have to shard at all.
tingletech
50 days ago
|
prev
|
next
[–]
that article seems to suggest 20TB total over the dozen deployments in prod.
happyopossum
50 days ago
|
prev
[–]
Sure, but 20TB in “the only database you need” is mere hours or minutes worth of data for many workflows.
Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch!
Applications
are open till July 27.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: