Hacker Timesnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm curious how your mobile testing compares to https://revyl.com

I've been experimenting with Revyl and it's really nice. I think this agent-driven testing is the future.



Curious how they frame testing on real devices: “Real devices on demand: spin up iOS simulators and Android emulators”. So those are not real/physical devices?

Physical devices for AI agents is something we at TestingBot do provide: https://testingbot.com/support/ai/mcp


We support both web and mobile, which is what a lot of companies prefer, just one agent for both. Also, I'm pretty sure Revyl relies only on vision models, which tend to be slower. We built the platform around a hybrid approach that combines vision and accessibility APIs, which is much faster.

Would love to hear your feedback after you try it out!


Try the OSS alternative - https://github.com/vostride/agent-qa




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: