Curious how they frame testing on real devices: “Real devices on demand: spin up iOS simulators and Android emulators”. So those are not real/physical devices?
We support both web and mobile, which is what a lot of companies prefer, just one agent for both. Also, I'm pretty sure Revyl relies only on vision models, which tend to be slower. We built the platform around a hybrid approach that combines vision and accessibility APIs, which is much faster.
Would love to hear your feedback after you try it out!
I've been experimenting with Revyl and it's really nice. I think this agent-driven testing is the future.